Add unstable and uncommittted to populist and unaccountable

Ludwig,  like the Greens,  is never sure of much . Joel Fitzgibbbons was right on target. about those whose policies stem from the Greens . This week Ludwig  changed his worry from Food security to Food policy . From glass nearly empty to glass still half empty . He thinks he needs a policy to guide him .He's joined the worriers and their campaigns of great worry.and needs help to make better decisions
Why the slight change of emphasis ? . Perahps he's realised we export more food than we grow and like the refugees issue he's been populist and shallow by following  the simple " population out of control" and we are running out of everything"  arguments.
Personally I don't think the policy document will help him make decisions. Wouldn't have stopped  him from making stupid decision like closing down the cattle trade .
 Like SHY's "experiment to solve" solutions policy  on Q&A this week - just more delaying tactics and decision avoidance therapy. 

Queensland election result

Labors loss in OLD is due to a con . Labor thinks it is doing well incorporating green thinking into its policies . The people can see these idealists are kidding themselves . (Professionals could see it years earlier.) Many people don't mind paying for the long term a bit, but they drew the line at a con . Greenlabor is not credible on conservation . Neither the old or the new reactionaries can identify the problems SO how in the world do they get away with giving money away in each Shire panel;  to solve problems no one on the production ecology site sees -
If you don't believe the ABC ( why would you) ask a high percentage of rural Australians.
Better still -- If your don't believe me,  ask a Green what Shires should spend our money on - that would make interesting television or radio ! When we see it , we will watch the ABC again .SBS are much less predictable and more interesting .